بهینه سازی و مقایسه عملکرد سلول‌های خورشیدی لایه نازک CZTS و CZTSe

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 بخش مهندسی نانوالکترونیک، دانشکده فناوری های نوین، دانشگاه شیراز، شیراز، ایران

2 دانشگاه شیراز

چکیده

در این مقاله سلول‌های خورشیدی لایه نازک CZTS و CZTSe با ساختار FTO / CdS/ CZTS (CZTSe) / Mo با در نظر گرفتن اثرات بازترکیب و نقص شبیه سازی شده اند . تاثیردما، گاف انرژی، ضخامت و چگالی ناخالصی لایه جاذب و همچنین ضخامت و چگالی ناخالصی لایه بافر بر عملکرد این سلول ها مورد بررسی قرارگرفتند و دو سلول با هم مقایسه شدند. نتایج نشان داد که سلول خورشیدی CZTS دارای ولتاژ مدار باز بزرگتر برابر 0.95 ولت و سلول خورشیدی CZTSe دارای چگالی جریان اتصال کوتاه بزرگتر به میزان 31 میلی آمپر بر سانتی متر مربع می باشند. برای سلول های خورشیدی CZTS و CZTSe در دمای اتاق و در حالت بهینه، به ترتیب بازده %44/17 و %28/14 حاصل شد، که نسبت به سلول های خورشیدی لایه نازک CZTS و CZTSe متداول بهبود چشمگیری حاصل گردیده است. ضمنا نشان داده شد که وابستگی بازده سلول CZTS به دما در مقایسه با سلول CZTSe کمتر است. در کلیه شبیه سازی ها، سلول تحت تابش استاندارد 1/5 AM قرار داشته است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Optimization and Performance Comparison of CZTS and CZTSe Thin Film Solar Cells

نویسندگان [English]

  • Sajjad Dehghani 1
  • Samaneh Amiri 2
1 Department of Nanoelectronics engineering, Faculty of Advance Technologies, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran
2 Shiraz university
چکیده [English]

In this paper, CZTS and CZTSe thin-film solar cells with FTO / CdS / CZTS (CZTSe)/ Mo structure are simulated, considering the impact of defects and recombination. The effects of temperature, bandgap energy, thickness and doping concentration of the absorber layers, as well as the effects of the thickness and doping concentration of the buffer layer on the cells performance were investigated and compared with each other. It is shown that the CZTS solar cell has a higher open circuit voltage (Voc = 0.95 V) while the CZTSe solar cell has a higher short circuit current density (Jsc = 31 mA / cm2). At 300 k, the maximum efficiencies of 17.44% and 14.28% were obtained for the optimum CZTS and CZTSe cells, respectively. The efficiency has been improved significantly compared to the previous works. It was also shown that the efficiency of CZTS cell is less temperature dependent. All simulations were done under AM1.5 illumination.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Thin film Solar Cells
  • CZTS
  • CZTSe
  • Efficiency
[1] X. Liu, Y. Feng, H. Cui, F. Liu, X. Hao, G. Conibeer, D. Mitzi and M. Green,” The current status and future prospects of kesterite solar cells: a brief review”, progress in photovoltaics: research and applications, Vol. 24, PP. 879–898, 2016.
[2] P. Moghadam and M. Hayat, “A novel optimized double junction CZTS/CIGS solar cell with improved performance: A numerical simulation”, optik, Vol. 154, PP. 676-684, 2017.
[3] H. Arbouz, A. Aissat and J. Vilcot, “Simulation structure for 4ZnSnS2n/Cu-mization of CdSiand optsolar cell applications”, International journal of hydrogen energy, Vol. 42, PP. 8827-8832, 2017.
[4] A. Reshak, K. Nouneh and I. Kityk, “Structural, Electronic and Optical Properties in Earth-and 4ZnSnS2c Absorber of CuiAbundant PhotovoltaInternational from DFT calculations”, 4ZnSnSe2CuJournal of Electrochemical Science, Vol. 9, PP. 955 – 974, 2014.
[5] D. Adeyinka, A. Muteeu, A. Olopade and M. Chendo, “Prediction and optimization of the performance characteristics of CZTS thin film solar cell using band gap grading”, Optical Quantum Electronic, Vol. 49, PP. 336-349, 2017.
[6] J. Lia, S. Kim and Y. Zhang, “Tailoring the defects and carrier density for beyond 10% efficient CZTSe thin film solar cells”, Solar Energy Materials & Solar Cells, Vol. 159, PP. 447-455, 2017.
[7] P. H. Drive, “Atlas User’s Manual device simulation software”, 2016.
[8] U. Saha and M. Alam, “Proposition and computational analysis of a kesterite/kesterite tandem solar cell with enhanced efficiency”, RSC Advances, Vol. 7, PP. 4806-4814, 2017.
[9] K. ITO, “Copper Zinc Tin Sulfide-Based Thin-Film Solar Cells”, wiley, PP. 172-173, 2015.
[10] S. Meher, L. Balakrishnan and Z. Ale, /CdS based photovoltaic 4ZnSnS2Analysis of Cu“cell: A numerical simulation approach,” Superlattices and Microstructures, Vol. 100, PP. 703-722, 2016.
[11] C. Yan, J. Huang, K. Sun, S. Johnston, Y. Zhang, H. Sun, A. Pu, M. He, F. Liu, K. Eder, L. Yang, J. Cairney, N. Daukes, Z. Hameiri, John. Stride, S. Chen, M. Green and X. Hao, “Cu2ZnSnS4 solar cells with over 10% power conversion efficiency enabled by heterojunction
heat treatment”, Nature energy, Vol. 3, PP. 764–772, 2018.
[12] M. Doriani, H. Jahromi, M. H. Sheikhi, “A , ”Solar Cell 2Highly Efficient Thin Film CuInGaSeJournal of Solar Energy Engineering, Vol. 137, PP. 064501-5, 2015.
[13] H. Zhang, S. Cheng, J. Yu, H. Zhou and H. Jia., “Prospects of Zn (O, S) as an alternative buffer film solar cells from -thin 4ZnSnS2layer for Cunumerical simulation, Micro & Nano Letters, Vol. 11, pp. 386–390, 2016.
[14] W. Zhao, W. Zhou and X. Mial, “Numerical Simulation of CZTS Thin Film Solar Cell”, 7th IEEE International Conference on Nano/Micro Engineered and Molecular Systems (NEMS), 2012.
[15] S. Vallisree, R. Thangave and T. Lenka, “Theoretical investigations on enhancement of photovoltaic efficiency of nanostructured CZTS/ZnS/ZnO based solar cell device”, Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics, Vol. 29, PP. 7262–7272, 2018.
[16] S. Bag, O. Gunawan and D. Mitzi, “Low band gap liquid-processed CZTSe solar cell with 10.1% efficiency”, Energy Environmental Science, Vol. 5, PP. 7060-7065, 2012.
[17] U. Rau and H. Schock, “Electronic properties recent –heterojunction solar cells 2In,Ga)SeCu (of achievements, current understanding, and future challenges”, Applied Physics A: Materials Science & Processing, Vol.69, PP. 131-147, 1999.
[18] M. Patel and A. Ray, “Enhancement of output A -thin film solar cells 4ZnSnS2of Cu performancenumerical simulation approach and comparison to experiments”, Physica B, Vol. 407, PP. 4391–4397, 2012.
[19] A. Cherouana and R. Labbani, “Study of CZTS and CZTSSe solar cells for buffer layers selection”, Applied Surface Science, Vol. 424, PP. 251-255, 2017.